As most of you know, the finance minister in his recent budget has proposed to re-introduce the long term capital gains (LTCG) tax at a rate of 10% on equity shares and mutual funds. In addition, there is now a dividend distribution tax on equity mutual funds.
So, the stage is set to rob Peter – Thank you! The premise is that “almost” all the people who are benefiting from the current zero LTCG are large industrialists and fund houses, who keep putting their money into the capital markets. Some people say that the industrialists are getting away by earning money in the markets instead of spending it on industry – fair enough. But, even for a moment did people sitting in the higher echelons of the Government – the ministers, bureaucrats etc. give a thought to the salaried “aam aadmi” – common man – who puts his/her hard earned salary in the form of SIP every month in a disciplined way into the mutual funds, hoping to secure their future?
Why should the salaried common man be bucketed in along with the industrialists? Can’t they be exempted from the LTCG as a goodwill? After all, it is this salaried common man who contributes the bulk of the income tax collected – by force or by choice, they even contribute to a bulk of the GST that comes through every transaction made by them. So, the effective tax rate on the salaried common man is probably 60-70% for those in the 30% tax bracket.
And what about Paul? Why should Peter’s hard earned mutual fund income be used to pay the health insurance bills for Paul? Why can’t Paul do something worthwhile to earn that insurance? Will the insurance really reach the needy Pauls out there? Think for a moment about the UPA Government’s grandiose “Food Security Act” – has it in any way reduced the number of hungry people on the streets in India? What about all those people in the slums and begging at the traffic signals – why aren’t they being given food for free every day, as it was promised? What happened to all the taxes you collected from Peter to fund this? What gives me the confidence that the hard saved monthly SIPs of the salaried common man which are now being diverted to fund health insurance for Paul would really reach the Pauls out there?
Flawed economics, even more flawed politics Mr. Finance Minister! This country will never learn that robbing Peter to pay Paul never makes Peter or Paul any better. Surely, you heard that adage about how to teach a man to fish? Thank you once again for robbing me and so many salaried common people out there to fund an abyss which never gets filled.
P.S1: Let’s not even talk about what happens to the additional 1% education cess that you will start collecting – we already know where the 3% you have collected for over 10 years resides – deep inside a drain in the middle of the earth or the fat pockets of your esteemed colleagues across India – I don’t think education in Government schools is any better for it. And yes, Thanks for the sham 40,000 standard deduction, while slyly taking away the medical and transport allowance – who said the salaried common man is intelligent? We are blind, Thank you – just can’t see what you did as 40,000 is a big amount for us!
P.S2: Please note that there is a huge difference between the salaried common man and the common man – it’s deliberately emphasized through this article. It irks me when this distinction is never made and common man is always supposed to be the man on the street.